Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency
The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: Does vitamin D increase calcium absorption, bone mass and muscle mass and function in women past menopause who have mildly low vitamin D levels? Do these benefits require prescription-strength vitamin D, or is an over the counter vitamin D dose enough?
Description
Osteoporosis is a major health problem in postmenopausal women. At age 50, half of women will suffer an osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime, causing increased disability and mortality. Vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D <15 ng/mL, contributes to osteoporosis via decreased calcium absorption (Ca��Ab), secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT), increased bone resorption and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Thus, experts agree that patients with vitamin D deficiency should receive vitamin D therapy.
Vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) is a milder form of hypovitaminosis D defined as a 25(OH)D level between 15 and 30 ng/mL regardless of parathyroid hormone (PTH) status. Experts disagree on whether to treat VDI, as the clinical benefits of therapy are uncertain. Some experts insist the optimal 25(OH)D level is ���30 ng/mL. By contrast, both the Food and Nutrition Board and NIH Evidence Report No. 158 state that insufficient evidence exists to declare the optimal serum 25(OH)D for bone health, despite review of ~170 studies. Consequently, the Food and Nutrition Board cannot determine a recommended daily allowance for vitamin D. Confusion over the optimal 25(OH)D level results, in part, because previous trials failed to recruit subjects based on initial 25(OH)D levels and/or failed to target or achieve 25(OH)D levels ���30 ng/mL. Moreover, secondary HPT, the proposed mechanism by which VDI causes bone loss, occurs in only 10% to 33% of people with VDI. As such, people with VDI and normal PTH might not experience clinical benefits from vitamin D therapy. VDI is widespread, affecting 26% to 39% of postmenopausal American women with and without osteoporosis. Therefore, determining the ideal 25(OH)D level for optimal calcium homeostasis and bone health is of utmost clinical and public health importance. Our overall goal, congruent with Healthy People 2010 objective 2-9, is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with VDI, as reflected by changes in Ca��Ab, BMD and muscle fitness. Our second goal is to evaluate whether a high-dose vitamin D regimen, chosen to achieve and maintain a 25(OH)D level
- 30 ng/mL, is superior in its effects on study outcomes compared to a low-dose vitamin D regimen that can permit continued VDI.
We will conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial of low-dose and high-dose vitamin D in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency in order to investigate the following aims:
To evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 therapy on Ca��Ab in postmenopausal women less than or equal to 75 years old with VDI. Sub-aims include the investigation of subject variables influencing Ca��Ab and 25(OH)D levels at baseline and one month, the accuracy of oral isotope plasma levels for Ca��Ab measurement and the ability of a questionnaire to identify patients with low vitamin D status.
To evaluate the effects of vitamin D3 therapy on the 12-month change in BMD and bone turnover in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing change in BMD and an evaluation of the relationship between changes in Ca��Ab and changes in BMD.
To evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on muscle mass and functional capacity in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. We will measure muscle mass by whole body bone densitometry and assess muscle function using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and the modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing muscle outcomes.
Status: Not yet recruiting (Phase 4). Started on July 1st, 2009. Ended on June 1st, 2014.
Enrollment: 250 subjects
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design:
- Treatment
- Randomized
- Double Blind (Subject
- Investigator)
- Placebo Control
- Parallel Assignment
- Efficacy Study
Conditions:
Interventions:
- Drug: High Dose Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol)
- Drug: Low Dose Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol)
- Drug: Placebo (sugar pill)
- Drug: Placebo (sugar pill)
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D 16 to 25 ng/mL by HPLC assay
Women ��� 5 years past the date of last menses or bilateral oophorectomy, or ��� 60 years old if they had prior hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy
Total dietary and supplemental calcium intake ��� 1,100 mg daily, based on a food frequency questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria:
Women > 75 years old
Hypercalcemia (serum calcium corrected for albumin > 10.4 mg/dL)
Nephrolithiasis by medical record or patient report
Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption or chronic diarrhea
Stage 3, 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease based on the MDRD formula
Use of bone-active medications within the past 6 months including bisphosphonates, estrogen compounds, calcitonin, teriparatide, oral corticosteroids and anticonvulsants
Allergy or intolerance to orange juice
Allergy or intolerance to sunscreen
Prior adult clinical fragility fracture of the hip, spine or wrist or a T-score below -2.5 at the lumbar spine or femur
- Gender
Female
- Mininum Age
N/A
- Maximum Age
75 Years
- Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Resources
Source: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
Locations
-
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison
Wisconsin
53792
United States
Officials
Karen E Hansen, MD (Principal Investigator, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health)
Sponsors
University of Wisconsin, Madison (Lead Sponsor)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Collaborator)
References
Hansen KE, Jones AN, Lindstrom MJ, Davis LA, Engelke JA, Shafer MM. Vitamin D Insufficiency: Disease or No Disease? J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Feb 26; [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 18302509.
Check for Full Text
Links
None.
- Date Verified
- July 1st, 2009
- First Received
- July 6th, 2009
- Last Changed
- July 6th, 2009
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on July 07, 2009. Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
All data in the Healia Clinical Trials Information Database and content displayed by the Healia Clinical Trials Search Engine are licensed from the National Institutes of Health (National Library of Medicine), which collects and maintains the data.
The Healia Clinical Trials Search Engine searches the data set at clinicaltrials.gov, providing up-to-date information about current clinical trials. In the Healia Clinical Trials Database you can find information on new experimental drugs, medical devices, and other types of treatments for all types of diseases. Each clinical trial description includes information about the phase of the trial (phase I, phase II, or phase III), the trial’s methods, such as whether it is a randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study, and the status of the trial including whether or not the trial is currently enrolling new participants.
